Audrey Kletscher Helbling raises a great question on her Minnesota Prairie Roots blog today: Are houses allowed to decay more in small towns, or does it just seem that way because there are fewer houses in small towns?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0945d/0945db355803e7d648bccd839965a79376115dd7" alt="Audrey Kletscher Helbling"
She bases her observation on her specialty: stopping in small towns that most other people zip right through without giving neither a thought nor a damn. In this case, it’s Delhi, Minnesota, home to about 70 people in Redwood County.
Like many small towns, she notes, Delhi once boomed. That was a long time ago.
Many other businesses once operated here, but they are no more, with the noticeable exception of a grain business. Delhi, in the late 1800s, housed general, drug, hardware and lumber stores, a hotel, a railroad and telegraph agent, a feed mill, a blacksmith shop, a farm implement business and more.
There’s a lot of pain on the prairie. Her post is a reminder that there are two Minnesotas: The one where times are good, and the ones where they very clearly aren’t.